<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Security Roundtable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securityroundtable.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com</link>
	<description>Security Podcasters Discussing Top Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:36:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on September Security Round Table: Do we have privacy anymore? by bfbcping</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7119</link>
		<dc:creator>bfbcping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2007/09/23/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/#comment-7119</guid>
		<description>This episode was enjoyable as always, but there were some serious audio issues (phones ringing, dishes clinking, and various other extraneous sounds) that really distracted from the enjoyment of the show. Martin McKeay&#039;s connection was particularly bad.

Overall, content was really good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode was enjoyable as always, but there were some serious audio issues (phones ringing, dishes clinking, and various other extraneous sounds) that really distracted from the enjoyment of the show. Martin McKeay&#8217;s connection was particularly bad.</p>
<p>Overall, content was really good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on September Security Round Table: Do we have privacy anymore? by If THEY can&#8217;t answer the question &#8220;What is privacy?&#8221;&#8230;Then we&#8217;re REALLY on our own! &#124; Security Views</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7118</link>
		<dc:creator>If THEY can&#8217;t answer the question &#8220;What is privacy?&#8221;&#8230;Then we&#8217;re REALLY on our own! &#124; Security Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2007/09/23/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/#comment-7118</guid>
		<description>[...] Security Roundtable&#8217;s September, 2007 podcast (HERE) has a great discussion on several different aspects of privacy. Michael, Rebecca, Martin, Andrew, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Security Roundtable&#8217;s September, 2007 podcast (HERE) has a great discussion on several different aspects of privacy. Michael, Rebecca, Martin, Andrew, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on September Security Round Table: Do we have privacy anymore? by www.andrewhay.ca &#187; September Security Round Table: Do we have privacy anymore?</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7116</link>
		<dc:creator>www.andrewhay.ca &#187; September Security Round Table: Do we have privacy anymore?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2007/09/23/september-security-round-table-do-we-have-privacy-anymore/#comment-7116</guid>
		<description>[...] I had the opportunity on Friday to take part in a Security Round Table panel with Michael Santarcangelo, Rebecca Herold, Dr. Anton Chuvakin, Martin McKeay, and Dan York, discussing &#8220;Do we have privacy anymore?&#8221;. You can listen to the podcast here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I had the opportunity on Friday to take part in a Security Round Table panel with Michael Santarcangelo, Rebecca Herold, Dr. Anton Chuvakin, Martin McKeay, and Dan York, discussing &#8220;Do we have privacy anymore?&#8221;. You can listen to the podcast here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 5 &#8211; Security of VoIP in the Enterprise by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-7114</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2006/10/02/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/#comment-7114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Security Seal...&lt;/strong&gt;

Related Articles about security seal   Dems Slam Rival&#039;s Use of  Seal  State Leaders Renew Claim That Homeland  Security  Logo Was Used Inappropriately By GOP Senate Candidate...  From New York Newsday on 08/30/2007 use of a state Homeland Security se...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Security Seal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Related Articles about security seal   Dems Slam Rival&#8217;s Use of  Seal  State Leaders Renew Claim That Homeland  Security  Logo Was Used Inappropriately By GOP Senate Candidate&#8230;  From New York Newsday on 08/30/2007 use of a state Homeland Security se&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Security Round Table for August 2007 &#8211; Security Career Success by FRACAT - Free Resume And Career Toolbox Blog &#187; NEW PODCAST: (Security) Employment Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/the-security-round-table-for-august-2007-security-career-success/comment-page-1/#comment-7112</link>
		<dc:creator>FRACAT - Free Resume And Career Toolbox Blog &#187; NEW PODCAST: (Security) Employment Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2007/08/17/the-security-round-table-for-august-2007-security-career-success/#comment-7112</guid>
		<description>[...] If something doesn&#8217;t seem to be working right for you, you can click here to go to the source page for the audio. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If something doesn&#8217;t seem to be working right for you, you can click here to go to the source page for the audio. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Security Roundtable for February 2007 &#8211; OpenID by BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [security round table] OpenID Discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/the-security-roundtable-for-february-2007-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [security round table] OpenID Discussion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17#comment-427</guid>
		<description>[...] There was a really interesting discussion about OpenID. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was a really interesting discussion about OpenID. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Security Roundtable for February 2007 &#8211; OpenID by Network Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/the-security-roundtable-for-february-2007-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17#comment-423</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Latest episode of the Security Roundtable: OpenID...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Latest episode of the Security Roundtable: OpenID&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Security Roundtable for February 2007 &#8211; OpenID by The Security Catalyst &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The return of the Security Round Table - and with OpenID</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/the-security-roundtable-for-february-2007-openid/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>The Security Catalyst &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The return of the Security Round Table - and with OpenID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17#comment-422</guid>
		<description>[...] For the complete show notes - check out http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17  In case I wasn&#8217;t clear - if you have any interest in understanding OpenID - you will need to go see what has to be the most impressive collection of links I have seen yet. Dan York is amazing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the complete show notes &#8211; check out <a href="http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17 " rel="nofollow">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=17 </a> In case I wasn&#8217;t clear &#8211; if you have any interest in understanding OpenID &#8211; you will need to go see what has to be the most impressive collection of links I have seen yet. Dan York is amazing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table Episode #6 by Network Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-6/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=16#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Episode 6 of the Security Roundtable is online. Finally....&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 6 of the Security Roundtable is online. Finally&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 5 &#8211; Security of VoIP in the Enterprise by Hailey checked out Pittsburgh &#187; Jun. Trip report for Paradise</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Hailey checked out Pittsburgh &#187; Jun. Trip report for Paradise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2006/10/02/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] 08:15 - Dan was part of a Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 08:15 &#8211; Dan was part of a Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 5 &#8211; Security of VoIP in the Enterprise by Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2006/10/02/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] I was the guest on the recent Security Roundtable podcast #5 focused on VoIP security.  I gave an overview of VoIP security issues, discussed some best practices and answered numerous questions from the group of hosts.  It was a wide-ranging discussion that covered enterprise VoIP issues, Skype, recent legislation, enterprise network issues and much more.  It was a fun podcast to be part of and I do appreciate the SRT team inviting my participation.  If you are new to VoIP security issues in general, do give it a listen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was the guest on the recent Security Roundtable podcast #5 focused on VoIP security.  I gave an overview of VoIP security issues, discussed some best practices and answered numerous questions from the group of hosts.  It was a wide-ranging discussion that covered enterprise VoIP issues, Skype, recent legislation, enterprise network issues and much more.  It was a fun podcast to be part of and I do appreciate the SRT team inviting my participation.  If you are new to VoIP security issues in general, do give it a listen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 5 &#8211; Security of VoIP in the Enterprise by Blue Box: The VoIP Security Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Box: The VoIP Security Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/2006/10/02/security-round-table-episode-5-security-of-voip-in-the-enterprise/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security...&lt;/strong&gt;

FYI, I was the guest on the recent Security Roundtable podcast #5 focused on VoIP security. I gave an overview of VoIP security issues, discussed some best practices and answered numerous questions from the group of hosts. It was a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Security Roundtable podcast on VoIP security&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>FYI, I was the guest on the recent Security Roundtable podcast #5 focused on VoIP security. I gave an overview of VoIP security issues, discussed some best practices and answered numerous questions from the group of hosts. It was a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SRT Episode 4 &#8211; Responsible Reporting of Breaches by Security Ripcord</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt-episode-4-responsible-reporting-of-breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Ripcord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=14#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Letter to Santa on Security 2.0...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just wrote an E-mail to Michael Santarcangelo of the Security Catalyst  about his Security 2.0  initiative. Please comment if you have any input.&#160; Also watch out for Michael to open the Security Catalyst Community  soon.&#160; You should also li...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Letter to Santa on Security 2.0&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just wrote an E-mail to Michael Santarcangelo of the Security Catalyst  about his Security 2.0  initiative. Please comment if you have any input.&nbsp; Also watch out for Michael to open the Security Catalyst Community  soon.&nbsp; You should also li&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SRT Episode 4 &#8211; Responsible Reporting of Breaches by BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [security roundtable] responsible disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt-episode-4-responsible-reporting-of-breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [security roundtable] responsible disclosure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=14#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Couldn&#8217;t finish listening to the security roundtable ep. 4 about responsible disclosure. Made me too anxious thinking about how I had been a contractor for so many years, monkeying around with various client computers, without legal councel. Basically, what I got from most of the discussion, is that a) unless you are rich enuf to defend yourself against a corporation, you have not economic incentive to responsibly disclose against a potentially agressive vendor b) don&#8217;t disclose except thru your legal councel. Let a lawyer represent and disclose thru their firm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Couldn&#8217;t finish listening to the security roundtable ep. 4 about responsible disclosure. Made me too anxious thinking about how I had been a contractor for so many years, monkeying around with various client computers, without legal councel. Basically, what I got from most of the discussion, is that a) unless you are rich enuf to defend yourself against a corporation, you have not economic incentive to responsibly disclose against a potentially agressive vendor b) don&#8217;t disclose except thru your legal councel. Let a lawyer represent and disclose thru their firm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SRT Episode 4 &#8211; Responsible Reporting of Breaches by Network Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt-episode-4-responsible-reporting-of-breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=14#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Responsible disclosure, the other type...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Responsible disclosure, the other type&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 1 &#8211; Email Security by BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [podcast] security roundtable: email security</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-1-email-security/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>BitRatchet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [podcast] security roundtable: email security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=6#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] This was a good listen. Also on that page you&#8217;ll find a link to a list of disposable email address providers. This is a good idea for combatting spam&#8230;it makes a moving target of your inbox. Having a permanent address that&#8217;s a capta-hurdle like Extrahoop would be a way to catch up with someone you want to email. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This was a good listen. Also on that page you&#8217;ll find a link to a list of disposable email address providers. This is a good idea for combatting spam&#8230;it makes a moving target of your inbox. Having a permanent address that&#8217;s a capta-hurdle like Extrahoop would be a way to catch up with someone you want to email. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Liability for Vulnerabilities and Responsible Reporting by gazanga</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt3/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>gazanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=12#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if my last post went through.

I enjoyed the podcast but am getting kind of sick of people not being able to lose their objectivity.  They have such a built in hatred for Microsoft that they can&#039;t recognize where they were and where they are.  The old-school, if you don&#039;t wet yourself when you hear *nix, is really short-sighted.  The fact is Microsoft is here to stay.  Their patch schedule is a great idea and is saving enterprises lots of money and allowing them to better calculate risk.  
As Alan said, on a vulnerabilities to user ratio, Microsoft is a better solution for most.  The OS is easier to patch and not that bad.  I will always have an affinity for my *nix flavors, but I know my endusers and CEO will always make me have to support Microsoft.  With that being said, I think that with it being a necessary evil, it&#039;s good to have a reliable patch schedule.

Also as far as the format goes, I really enjoyed a lot of what everyone had to say, with the exception of Martin.  He is a bit long winded and doesn&#039;t really offer anything new or relevant to the conversation.  He&#039;s about 80% B.S. and 20% over his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if my last post went through.</p>
<p>I enjoyed the podcast but am getting kind of sick of people not being able to lose their objectivity.  They have such a built in hatred for Microsoft that they can&#8217;t recognize where they were and where they are.  The old-school, if you don&#8217;t wet yourself when you hear *nix, is really short-sighted.  The fact is Microsoft is here to stay.  Their patch schedule is a great idea and is saving enterprises lots of money and allowing them to better calculate risk.<br />
As Alan said, on a vulnerabilities to user ratio, Microsoft is a better solution for most.  The OS is easier to patch and not that bad.  I will always have an affinity for my *nix flavors, but I know my endusers and CEO will always make me have to support Microsoft.  With that being said, I think that with it being a necessary evil, it&#8217;s good to have a reliable patch schedule.</p>
<p>Also as far as the format goes, I really enjoyed a lot of what everyone had to say, with the exception of Martin.  He is a bit long winded and doesn&#8217;t really offer anything new or relevant to the conversation.  He&#8217;s about 80% B.S. and 20% over his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Liability for Vulnerabilities and Responsible Reporting by gazanga</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt3/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>gazanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=12#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I know that roundtables can be difficult but some of the rants were very biased.  It&#039;s the old school, if you defend Microsoft, you&#039;re not a true techy.  You can love *nix and appreciate what Microsoft does.  For example, look at McAfee.  In Feburary, they discovered and patched a vulnerability in EPO.  Last month, a third party finds the hole and announces it.  This requires McAfee to scramble for press releases to get the word out.  A regular update cycle could of helped remedy this.  

Imagine how much better Linux would be if a regular release schedule was available?

Overall you guys are doing well, I just get the idea that Martin is about 80% B.S. and 20% in over his head.  Just my opinion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that roundtables can be difficult but some of the rants were very biased.  It&#8217;s the old school, if you defend Microsoft, you&#8217;re not a true techy.  You can love *nix and appreciate what Microsoft does.  For example, look at McAfee.  In Feburary, they discovered and patched a vulnerability in EPO.  Last month, a third party finds the hole and announces it.  This requires McAfee to scramble for press releases to get the word out.  A regular update cycle could of helped remedy this.  </p>
<p>Imagine how much better Linux would be if a regular release schedule was available?</p>
<p>Overall you guys are doing well, I just get the idea that Martin is about 80% B.S. and 20% in over his head.  Just my opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Liability for Vulnerabilities and Responsible Reporting by cseifert</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/srt3/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>cseifert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=12#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed listening to your discussion on whether and when to disclose vulnerabilities to the public. I recommend the article &quot;Is finding security holes a good idea?&quot; by Eric Rescorla. He is taking an objective take on the issue looking at a cost analysis of the different scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed listening to your discussion on whether and when to disclose vulnerabilities to the public. I recommend the article &#8220;Is finding security holes a good idea?&#8221; by Eric Rescorla. He is taking an objective take on the issue looking at a cost analysis of the different scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security Round Table &#8211; Episode 1 &#8211; Email Security by The Podcast Roundtable &#187; Network Security Podcast, Episode 29</title>
		<link>http://www.securityroundtable.com/security-round-table-episode-1-email-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>The Podcast Roundtable &#187; Network Security Podcast, Episode 29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 05:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityroundtable.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Last, but not least, check out the other projects I&#8217;ve been working on lately, the first episode of the Security Roundtable and the fifth episode of the Podcast Roundtable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last, but not least, check out the other projects I&#8217;ve been working on lately, the first episode of the Security Roundtable and the fifth episode of the Podcast Roundtable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
